There are two approaches that Mediums take on the platform. Platform mediumship is a special way to connect with Spirit in front of an audience, sharing messages from loved ones who have passed. As a medium, there are two main ways to establish these connections—through the direct and indirect methods. Each method offers unique strengths, and many mediums develop a preference for one over the other. Let’s explore how both approaches work and why one isn’t necessarily better than the other.
The Direct Method: Immediate and Personal
In the direct method, the medium focuses on a specific individual in the audience. It usually begins with a question like, “May I come to you with a message?” Once permission is granted, the medium describes the Spirit and delivers the message directly to that person. This method creates a personal connection and allows for clear, specific details, such as names or memories that resonate with the recipient.
Many mediums, especially in the US, prefer the direct method because it provides immediate validation. By narrowing down to one person, the medium can ensure the message is clear and deeply personal. However, some believe that direct communication may involve using a medium’s psychic abilities rather than strictly communicating with Spirit, which can blur the lines between mediumship and psychic work.
The Indirect Method: Spirit-Led and Inclusive
In contrast, the indirect method involves the medium describing a Spirit without immediately addressing a specific person. The audience listens to the details and claims the Spirit if they feel a connection. This method allows Spirit to guide the process while giving the audience a chance to participate. It’s often favored by European mediums who rely on strong evidence to ensure only one or two people can relate to the Spirit being described.
The indirect method can be powerful, as it emphasizes the connection between Spirit and the recipient. It also fosters a sense of inclusivity, inviting more people to engage in the process before one person claims the message. Some believe this approach offers a more “pure” connection with Spirit, as it doesn’t rely on reading the audience’s energy.
Why Both Methods Matter
Both methods serve important roles in mediumship, and neither is better than the other. The choice often depends on the situation and the type of information coming through from Spirit. Flexibility is key. As mediums, we should be comfortable with both approaches so we can meet the needs of Spirit and the audience.
Sometimes, the Spirit communicator provides general information, which may call for a direct approach to avoid confusion. Other times, strong evidence allows the medium to use the indirect method and let the audience claim the Spirit. By becoming skilled in both, we honor the message and deliver it in the most meaningful way.
Finding Balance in Your Mediumship
Whether you prefer the direct or indirect method, both approaches offer valuable tools for connecting with Spirit. The direct method provides clear, personal messages, while the indirect method allows Spirit to take the lead. Each has its own strengths, and by blending or switching between the two, mediums can create more impactful experiences for the audience.
Remember, it’s not about which method is better. It’s about being open to the needs of Spirit and allowing the message to come through in the best way possible.
